Posts tagged indigenous people.

neltiliztli:

Brother Xico Gonzalez is amazing. This image, pues: profound!

Sadly, many fail or are not willing to recognize the politics surrounding the construction of master narratives in relation to the “historical record”.

This image is no doubt a counter narrative to the “official” historical record.

I’m reminded of Brother Howard Zinn’s profound words:

“The memory of oppressed people is one thing that cannot be taken away, and for such people, with such memories, revolt is always an inch below the surface.”

More on Xico Gonzalez found on his website: http://xicogonzalez.com/

(via readnfight)

I hope they show the time where they traded guns to the Indians for corn, and then the Indians shot them and took the corn.

- Bart Simpson (via teachingtoday)

My wildest daydreams look like this.

Family thanksgiving

Today my family all went to the Pequot Museum, a really extensive indigenous history museum on the Mashantucket Pequot reservation and owned and run by members of the tribe. It was a nice change of pace from how natural history museums (what up, Field Museum in Chicago) often treat indigenous people as a part of landscapes, less than human. (And oh no, I’d best not hear anything about how it could be a compliment to be seen as “closer to nature” or how objecting to that is speciesist; that junk is blatantly racist.)

I appreciated that they didn’t sugarcoat things, like they were pretty clear about damage done by Europeans in the americas, and ways that Europeans tried to claim indigenous people’s knowledge of the land in the Northeast. There was a recreation of a couple men putting up a spiky wooden fence around their village to keep Europeans out because they were coming into the village and fucking with people. All the stories being told in the exhibits I saw were told in ways that acknowledged that native folks aren’t extinct; indigenous cultures weren’t being talked about in past tense like often happens.

The Pequot Museum is hosting the Smithsonian’s exhibit Indivisible about African-Indigenous people in the americas. I’d already seen the online version of the exhibit and was really excited about it. We had to leave, though, before we’d seen much of that exhibit, so I’ll try to go back sometime soon and take notes.

The Pine Ridge reservation needs you!

girl-germs:

ceramickitten:

My dearest friends,

Last year so many of you came together and helped donate money to purchase toys for the children on Pine Ridge reservation. Thank You!

It was wonderful but unfortunately (my people) the Oglala Lakota Sioux need more than toys this year, they need propane. I know that toys are something pretty and heart swelling, I was totally in tears when I saw the little brown doll I requested to be bought last year. Unfortunately, at this time, it’s more grim than that. The most basic of needs is the most important thing to aid with.

lease consider donating to this in someone’s honor instead of attending Black Friday. If you cannot help, please consider sharing this to signal boost so that more can.

Much love to all of you. ♥

Paypal donations to koja@riseup.net

    •    According to current USDA Rural Development documents, the Lakota have the lowest life expectancy of any group in America. The median income on the reservation is approximately $2,600 to $3,500 per year, with about 97% of people living far below the federal poverty line. 

    •    Heating and fueling just one house on the reservation can easily impact 2 dozen lives, as there are an average of 17 people per family home (with up to 30 in many houses).

    •    39% of the homes on the Pine Ridge Reservation have no basic water, sewage system or electricity and lack basic insulation.

…this has 15 notes.

cuntymint:

kemetically-ankhtified:

Happy Native American Day!

Give thanks to your Native ancestors for taking care of this land, for appreciating our Earth, for providing for and supporting each other the ways that Europeans have not. This spirit lives in many of us today within the African Diaspora. Keep them in your memories.

Eat well everyone!

I totally just got back from the Indigenous People’s Sunrise Gathering at Alcatraz. So good, so moving. Also, hella cuties. 

Really really like this statement.

(via cuntofdoom)

yourhue:

We Still Live Here - Âs Nutayuneân

When the Pilgrims arrived at Plymouth Rock, it was the Wampanoag of Southern Massachusetts who met them. They are credited in history books with helping the settlers survive in their new surroundings. Yet beyond the Thanksgiving narrative, their story, like the stories of Native people across the continent, is rarely told.

“We Still Live Here: Âs Nutayuneân” is a new film that documents the incredible effort of the Wampanoag cultural revival through language. Beginning in the 1990s, the Mashpee, Aquinnah, Assonet, and Herring Pond Wampanoag communities initiated the Wopanaak Language Reclamation Project after uncovering a trove of documents from the sixteenth century. The documents were written in their native language, which hasn’t been spoken in over a century and a half.

The documentary follows Jessie Little Doe Baird, a Wampanoag social worker, and her work to arm her community with the tools and skills to reclaim their mother tongue. A graduate of MIT’s renowned linguistics program and recipient of a MacArthur Foundation grant, she is also the proud mother of a six-year-old daughter, the first native Wopanaak speaker in seven generations.

“We Still Live Here” is a success story in progress, the story of a dedicated community of learners and teachers breathing new life into the words of their ancestors.

(via so-treu)

babylonfalling:

Indian Tribal Lands 1493.

Click here to zoom.

(via so-treu)

unaguerrasinfondo:

Decolonize Geography : Caribbean

Jamaica -  Xaymaca (Taíno-Arawak)

Puerto Rico - Borikén or Borinquen (Taíno, meaning “Land of the Valiant Lord”)

Haiti/Dominican Republic - Haití (Taíno, meaning “Tall Mountain”. term referred to a region located on the island of Hispaniola and may have also been used to refer to the entire island.) 

Bahamas - Ba-ha-ma (possible Lucayan origen, meaning ‘large mupper middle land’) or Lucayo (Taíno name for Bahama islands and inhabitants.)

Cuba - Caobana (Taíno, meaning “Great Place”)

Grenada - Camerhogne (Kalinago)

Carriacou - Kayryoüacou or Cariouwacou (Kalinago, meaning ‘Island surrounded by reefs’)

Trinidad - Lëre or Lele (Kalinago meaning ‘Land of the Humingbird’)

Tobago - Tobago (Kalinago)

Barbados - Ichirouganami (Arawak)

Dominica - Wai’tu kubuli (Kalinago, meaning “Tall is her body”)

Martinique - Madinina (Kalinago, meaning “Land of Flowers”)

St. Lucia - Hiwanarau (Kalinago, meaning “Land of the Iguana”)

St. Vincent - Hairoun (Kalinago, meaning “Land of the Blessed”)

Bequia - Becoua (Kalinago, meaning “Land of the Clouds”)

Canouan - Cannouan (Kalinago, meaning “Island of Turtles”)

Anguilla - Malliouhana (Arawak, meaning Arrow-Shaped Sea Serpent)

St. Martin - Soualiga (Arawak, meaning “Land of Salt”)

St. Barths - Ouanalao (Arawak)

Saba - Amonhana (Arawak)

St. Eustatious - Aloi (Arawak)

Saint Crioux - Ay Ay (Taíno)

Saint Kitts - Liamuiga (Kalinago, meaning “Fertile Land”)

Nevis - Oualle (Kalinago)

Montserrat - Alliouagana (Kalinago, meaning “Land of Prickly Bush”)

Barbuda - Wa’omoni (Kalinago)

Antigua - Wadadli (Kalinago, “Land of Fish Oil”)

Redonda - Ocananmanrou (Kalinago)

Guadeloupe - Karukera (Kalinago)

Marie-Galante - Aichi (Kalinago) or Touloukaera (Arawak)

(via crunkfeministcollective)

They (Native Americans) didn’t have any rights to the land, and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights which they had not conceived and were not using. What was it that they were fighting for, when they opposed white men on this continent? For their wish to continue a primitive existence, their ‘right’ to keep part of the earth untouched, unused and not even as property, but just keep everybody out so that you will live practically like an animal, or a few caves above it. Any white person who brings the element of civilization has the right to take over this continent.

- Ayn Rand, statement at a Q and A session following her address to the graduating class of The United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, March 6, 1974 

“Any white person who brings the element of civilization has the right to take over this continent.”

I don’t even need to analyze this or add commentary to the extent I normally do. Ayn Rand is just a jerk.

(via she-hulk-smash)

She seriously is fucking terrible.

(via offbeatorbit)

I wish I had brought in this quote to school today! The kids I was working with are starting a project about exactly this.

(via bad-dominicana)

They probably felt so represented by the 99% that they took the day off.

My partner, in response to me saying I couldn’t find any info on a local college’s Native American student group’s annual anti-Columbus Day dance/event. My cynicism is rubbing off on him.

Civilized people can take our inalienable rights away. It seems fairly obvious from this that a society intent on eradicating theft in all its forms must eradicate “civilization.” Cooperativeness, the willingness to share goods and land, is not possible in a basically selfish framework; yet, by the words of the United States Congress, selfishness is a basic virtue of civilization….When the concepts of possessiveness or proprietorship disappear as being meaningful in our lives, the haunting sense of separation from the universe will be lessened because possessiveness requires selfishness, and selfishness is separation.

Paula Gunn Allen, “Notes Toward a Human Revolution” in Off the Reservation.

Derrick Jensen & crew, eat y’all’s hearts out. Women of color been saying this forever.

custerdiedforyoursins:

readnfight:

[Bunch of stuff is cut out, from this thread about indigenous people being compared to nature/animals]

Again, when white human culture tries to dominate both people of color and nature by linking them and insulting them alongside each other, we are not further insulting nature by refusing to be insulted so. And we absolutely do not need other people telling us how to respond.

In conclusion: since when was it in any ways decent for white people to tell people of color how to respond to racism, and to skew our refusal to be dominated in order to have some way to chime in on it? I’m (not) sorry when white people feel left out of conversations on how we deal with white supremacy. Cause this shit’s racist.

Oh, it makes me really sad when white people feel left out, because I’m speaking to them. It’s those people up there who are the people that need to read and take to heart what we’re all saying. They’re the ones who go around saying this shit (obviously).

Yeah, I guess I should clarify. White people should participate in a conversation like this, especially to listen and act in good faith (those two things are KEY!). But, they are showing they are not listening, acting in good faith, or thinking critically if they are telling people of color how to deal with racism—in this case saying it’s wrong and oppressive for indigenous people to be offended.

So, sit back and listen and do your homework and ask some questions that you’ve thought about, but please do not act like you know how people deal, especially if you’re not basing yourself on any kind of understanding of history.

cynicallyabsurd:

Fuck yeah, feminists!: DO NOT COMPARE NATIVE AMERICANS TO NATURE

dianamcqueen:

custerdiedforyoursins:

REPEAT: DO NOT COMPARE NATIVE AMERICANS TO NATURE. DO NOT ASSOCIATE US WITH NATURE. DO NOT SAY WE ARE CLOSE TO NATURE. DO NOT SAY WE UNDERSTAND NATURE. DO NOT MAKE ANY FUCKING CLAIM ABOUT NATIVE AMERICANS AND NATURE.

That is racist. Equating Native Americans to nature…

Actually no. I don’t think that when I think native Americans are close to nature. Not all of them are really the ones that protect the old ways I would view that way.

Honestly, you seem to view animals as less than human. I don’t. So please don’t assume that being close to nature is an insult. I think of all life equally. I also don’t think someone assuming all people who say one thing are all thinking the sane thing needs to examine so of their own prejudices.

^^^ Agreed. The original argument is extremely speciest and offensive.  If I call anyone (regardless of race or ethnicity) “close to nature” you may view that as an extreme complement. I do not view many Native Americans any “closer” to nature today than someone of English descent. Even so, there is NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING wrong with being “close to nature” or “like an animal.”  You, like me, ARE an animal and if you think that offensive, again, examine your own prejudices, please.

Okay. I think folks can agree on some things. Structurally white-human-centric culture sees its members (white people) as superior to indigenous people just as structurally white-human-centric culture sees its members as superior to nature and nonhuman animals. The issue isn’t how much you, as an individual, like animals and therefore don’t take it as an insult. The issue is the intent, the way it stands within that culture, and the history of that categorization as inferior. If you wouldn’t be insulted, good for you! If you don’t have to worry about racism against indigenous people, lucky! It’s not as much what the insult is, as the fact that an insult is being hurled.

For example, when my siblings and I were kids, we would make up mean names to call each other, that often weren’t even real words. On the one hand, someone else could come in and say we shouldn’t be mad at each other if the names we were calling each other didn’t mean anything; on the other hand, they did mean something, because we intended to hurt each other’s feelings. It didn’t matter what words we were using.

White supremacy will make up infinite ways to put people of color down. Many times it is by comparing people of color to people or beings that they are not. If I don’t want to be called a mudbaby, does that mean I don’t like mud? If I don’t like being portrayed as hypersexual because I am a black woman, does that mean I’m anti-sex? If I don’t want to be called a fox by someone who thinks I’m cute, does that mean I hate foxes? No! In all these cases, I don’t want to be characterized as something I’m not, based on my race or gender or whatever. It’s not the word itself, but the meaning behind it.

Further, these are really parts of the same system. White supremacy intends to dominate people of color as well as land and animals. Do a tiny bit of research and it’s incredibly clear. Look at early colonialism, look at indigenous resistance fights, look at what’s happening to indigenous people in the Amazon and Chiapas and the Niger Delta, look at where the US mines uranium and who’s poisoned by it, look at who lives on toxic land in cities, look at who lives in areas of cities with high asthma rates, look who cheap meat-based food is marketed towards. I mean, seriously, I don’t like telling people that they’re being simple-minded, but jeeeez.

White people came to the americas and Africa, called us savages and work horses and beasts and roaches and dogs. It is ridiculous to tell us that we should allow ourselves to be called that. When a white person compares people like me to cockroaches, they are showing respect for neither me nor the cockroach; it is not then wrong of me to call them on it. Maybe I personally like roaches; that doesn’t make it okay for a white person to call us that, even if I myself am not insulted.

Again, when white human culture tries to dominate both people of color and nature by linking them and insulting them alongside each other, we are not further insulting nature by refusing to be insulted so. And we absolutely do not need other people telling us how to respond.

In conclusion: since when was it in any ways decent for white people to tell people of color how to respond to racism, and to skew our refusal to be dominated in order to have some way to chime in on it? I’m (not) sorry when white people feel left out of conversations on how we deal with white supremacy. Cause this shit’s racist.

DO NOT COMPARE NATIVE AMERICANS TO NATURE

custerdiedforyoursins:

REPEAT: DO NOT COMPARE NATIVE AMERICANS TO NATURE. DO NOT ASSOCIATE US WITH NATURE. DO NOT SAY WE ARE CLOSE TO NATURE. DO NOT SAY WE UNDERSTAND NATURE. DO NOT MAKE ANY FUCKING CLAIM ABOUT NATIVE AMERICANS AND NATURE.

That is racist. Equating Native Americans to nature is racist because what you are really saying, cognizant of it or not, is that we are wild beasts. We are animals to you. We aren’t real people, but these in between creatures that ~understand the land around them.

This isn’t some shit I’m making up. Look at old US paintings from the 19th century. When they weren’t posing the Natives with their Indian Peace Medals (look that shit up), they were adding them to landscape paintings. You know why we were put in landscape paintings? BECAUSE WE WERE VIEWED AS A PART OF THE LANDSCAPE BECAUSE WE WEREN’T CONSIDERED PEOPLE.

So when you say that you admire the Natives’ view of nature (besides perpetuating a Native mono-culture which doesn’t exist), or when you claim that you are a Native because you understand plants and shit, YOU ARE A LYING SACK OF RACIST SHIT.

It gets pretty blatant when you go to a natural history museum (or flip through anything put out by National Geographic) and the only humans depicted are indigenous, because they are assumed to go alongside exhibits about dinosaurs and birds and trees and whatever. I went to a natural history museum a few months ago where the only exhibits on humans were indigenous americans and Senegal. Indigenous americans and sovereign West Africa are as extinct, I guess they meant, as the dinosaur whose skeleton was reconstructed in the museum’s atrium.

This is also why I get so pissed when people (yo green anarchists, I’m looking at a lot of y’all!) praise things things like “primitive” skills. Have they never thought how loaded that is? And that people, who surprisingly still exist, might not actually be flattered by that praise? I have had that conversation way too many times with way too many radicals.

(via jhameia)

that-cherokee-bitch:

hmsboatsix:

You are not your culture. You subscribe to a particular collective culture. You do not own it any more than the person who “appropriates” it. Welcome to the world of multiculturalism.

So we don’t own anything right?

We don’t own our land, so people steal it right our from under our feet. And it’s still being stolen from us as we speak, treaties are still being broken to this day.

We don’t own our children, so the government throws them in Indian boarding schools where they were whipped and beaten if they so much as uttered a word in their Native tongue.

We don’t own our culture because it’s everyone else’s right to take, manipulate, and extort us in the last way they can.

We don’t own our history because every time you open a history book we get completely ignored or forgotten and our actual history is wiped over to hide the truth from people eyes at the bloody history of this country. 

We don’t own our freedom because the BIA makes it difficult for us to maintain tribal sovereignty without the United States government intervening. 

We don’t own the right to move within our own continent because Europeans came here and created borders which my brothers and sisters can’t cross.

The colonizers would be proud of your mindset.

I am my culture, do not tell me otherwise.

Amazing.

(via tlayisgigeyusesdi-deactivated20)